Alimony and Equitable Distribution of marital assets and debts are tools that courts can, and often do, use to achieve equity. So long as there is competent substantial evidence supporting findings of valuation, and the required statutory findings regarding ED and alimony are made, courts have great discretion to fashion distribution and support schemes that […]
Category: Case Law Category
Testa v. Testa
In Testa v. Testa the appellate court reminds us that before imposing the sanction of barring a litigant from pro se filings, the trial court must first issue an order to show cause and provide notice to the pro se litigant and a reasonable opportunity to respond. Testa v Testa
Hooker v. Hooker
An interspousal gift is established by showing “ ‘(1) donative intent, (2) delivery or possession of the gift, and (3) surrender of dominion and control of the gift.’ “ Vigo v. Vigo, 15 So.3d 619, 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (quoting Mills v. Mills, 845 So.2d 230, 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)). The burden is […]
Kyriacou v. Kyriacou
In Kyriacou v. Kyriacou, the appellate court roundly criticizes the trial court. The trial court made an unequal equitable distribution, but in so doing made no mandatory findings relative the statutory factors of 61.075. The only finding that the trial court made was that the parties had an unequal ability (in the Husband’s favor) to […]
Robinson v. McDonald
Robinson v. McDonald does not explicitly say this, but it appears that the appellate court is giving tacit approval to a trial court entering a child support amount and reserving jurisdiction to change that amount when timesharing reaches 50/50. Apparently there is a 50/50 timesharing schedule with a transitional period that has been ordered, and […]
Weaver v. Weaver
Weaver v. Weaver is an equitable distribution case. The trial court’s distribution was unequal, and granted the Wife partial interest in a non-marital asset of the Husband due to enhancement during the marriage because of the contribution of marital funds. This was error because there was no substantial, competent evidence supporting the enhancement of the […]
Felipe v. Rincon
Felipe v. Rincon is a good reminder that certificates of service provide prima facie proof of actual service, and that actual service of pleadings is an indispensable component of due process. Here, a Default Final Judgment is set aside because the pleadings underlying it were not served, so there was no notice, even though the […]
Blevins v. Blevins
In Blevins v. Blevins, the trial court abused its discretion by granting modification based upon circumstances that were known at the time of the Final Judgment. The alleged change in circumstances was related to the distance of the Mother’s home from the child’s school, which was known at the time of the divorce. Blevins v […]
Hall v. Hall
In Hall v. Hall, the trial court denied the Husband’s motion to declare that the parties’ MSA was incomplete. The evidence presented did not support his claim of incompleteness. It appears that he was merely complaining that he made a bad deal. The fact that one party to an agreement apparently made a bad bargain […]
Garcia v. Garcia
Garcia v. Garcia was a case involving a request by the former husband for a downward modification of child support. The case was tried by the general magistrate, who denied the petition, and the trial judge adopted the recommendations after the former husband filed exceptions. This was error, because the record provided to the judge […]