In Benedict vs. Benedict, the trial court entered a judgment for alimony arrearages while a petition seeking to downwardly modify alimony was pending. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, but noted that the debtor is able to proceed in the future to obtain relief from the judgment (under Rule 1.540(b)(5)) to the extent that the […]
Tluzek v. Tluzek
Tluzek vs. Tluzek is a case of first impression in Florida. In involves the allocation of an adoption subsidy received by the parents of adopted children with special needs. The court ruled that the parents’ child support obligation should be determined first pursuant to the guidelines. Then, the adoption subsidy should be apportioned between the […]
Cockrell v. Kinnett
In Cockrell vs. Kinnett, the appellate court reversed a contempt order that modified the parties’ timesharing schedule with the child, because there was no pleading that alleged a significant change in circumstances. The mother was thus not put on notice that modification would be sought or granted. Modification is not a proper sanction for non-compliance. […]
SB 250 Passed Judiciary Committee!
SB 250 (2016) Family Law http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2016/0250 SENATE – CS by Judiciary; YEAS 7 NAYS 3
Brannon v. Palcu
In Brannon vs. Palcu, the appellate court granted a writ of certiorari because the trial court ordered that an otherwise privileged email between lawyer and client be produced under the conspiracy-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. An evidentiary hearing would be required before the privilege could be breached. Brannon v Palcu
Paternity and Timesharing
It often comes as a surprise to unmarried fathers that when they break up with the mother of their child, they do not have timesharing and decision-making rights automatically. In order to establish a timesharing schedule and to require the child’s mother to include them in major decisions, the father must file a Petition to […]
Legislation Recently Introduced by Florida Legislature
Last week, the Florida Legislature introduced four separate pieces of legislation of note. Three of the bills introduced deal with alimony, and the fourth deals with timesharing/parenting plans. The three bills dealing with alimony (House Bill 455 and Senate bills 250 and 668) have different language, which we have not yet looked into. We do […]
What is the scope of Domestic Violence (DV) Court?
All too often, clients who are faced with seeking, or defending against, a petition for domestic violence injunction begin thinking about every single fact, issue, or detail of their lives and the lives of the opposing party. Suddenly, parties want to dig up every piece of “dirt” they know about the other person, and they […]
Russell v. Pasik
Russell v Pasik Russell vs. Pasik is a case involving a same-sex (female) couple with children. The parties each had two children from artificial insemination. The children are referred to as biological half-siblings. Each child has a hyphenated last name with both Pasik and Russell (the opinion is silent on which order the names are […]
Rosenblum v. Rosenblum
Rosenblum v Rosenblum Rosenblum v. Rosenblum involves pro se litigants feeling their way through a typical set of circumstances. The former husband first filed a Motion to Modify Child Support (there is no discussion as to why it was appropriate to consider that as a motion rather than as a supplemental petition), and before that […]