Taylor v Taylor In Taylor v. Taylor, the 2d DCA reverses an award of durational, rather than permanent, alimony. The identified problem essentially was twofold, but really comes down to an absence of statutory findings. There is a lack of findings necessary to support the use of durational rather than permanent alimony, and the amount […]
Stat Dept. of Revenue v. Pare
Stat Dept of Revenue v Pare In DOR v. Pare, the trial court denied a UIFSA petition for child support because there was no legal order determining paternity and because he did not have legal custody of the child, despite the fact that the child was living with the father with the mother’s consent and […]
Parise v. Selph
Parise v Selph In Parise v. Selph, an Injunction for Protection Against Repeat Violence was reversed and remanded because the Respondent was denied his due process right to present his case.
Wells v. Whitfield
Wells v Whitfield In Wells vs. Whitfield, the 1st DCA reversed a child support award for lack of statutory findings regarding income. The amended final judgment did not include any findings specifying what portion of the retained earnings of the Husband’s solely-owned corporation were included by the court in determining the father’s gross income. Absent […]
Kelley v. Kelley
Kelley v Kelley In Kelly v. Kelly, the 4th DCA reversed and remanded the final judgment on the issues of equitable distribution and alimony. As to ED, the trial court had stated its intention to make equal awards to the parties, but a mathematical error in the equalizing payment made the award significantly unequal. As […]
Lopez v. Department of Revenue
Lopez v Department of Revenue Lopez vs. DOR involves a situation where section 57.105 attorney’s fees and costs are awarded as a sanction against the Department of Revenue in a misidentified paternity case. The case has a very wild factual scenario, which I commend everyone to read in its entirety. The bottom line is that […]
Alexander v. DOR
Alexander v Florida Dept of Revenue Alexander v. DOR was reversed for a trial de novo because there is no transcript of the administrative hearing because of a malfunction in the recording equipment.
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration The Rules of Judicial Administration has been amended concerning court interpreters.
Possible Alimony Law Changes In The Works
In this edition of the Men’s Rights Law Firm blog, we will discuss the pending alimony law changes that could become reality in the near future. The following is in an FAQ format, and may hold answers to questions by those facing unjust alimony obligations in their divorce decrees: 1. What are your thoughts on […]
Lessons Learned in Divorce Litigation
To paraphrase Santayana: those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. Here are a few of the lessons I have learned in almost two and a half decades of divorce litigation: Wait too long to file for divorce/modification/enforcement. The date of filing a divorce has the important distinction of […]