Rosenblum v. Rosenblum involves pro se litigants feeling their way through a typical set of circumstances. The former husband first filed a Motion to Modify Child Support (there is no discussion as to why it was appropriate to consider that as a motion rather than as a supplemental petition), and before that could be heard the wife filed a motion for contempt. Then a hearing was held on the motion for contempt, and the Husband argued that the motion to modify should have been heard before or simultaneously with the motion for contempt. The trial court disagreed, which was error. The previously filed motion should have been heard and resolved prior to or simultaneously with the contempt motion, so the contempt order was reversed and remanded.