Garcia v. Garcia was a case involving a request by the former husband for a downward modification of child support. The case was tried by the general magistrate, who denied the petition, and the trial judge adopted the recommendations after the former husband filed exceptions. This was error, because the record provided to the judge […]
Tag: appeal
Kemp v. Kemp
In Kemp v. Kemp, the trial court ordered an interim partial equitable distribution in the absence of a motion requesting such a distribution, and in the absence of any indication that such distribution could be revisited at a later date. This was error. The only thing requested was temporary attorney’s fees, which was denied. The […]
Dickson v. Dickson
In Dickson v. Dickson, the trial court abused its discretion by modifying the timesharing agreement without evidence that the welfare of the minor child would be promoted by the proposed change. Dickson v Dickson
Quinn v. Quinn
In Quinn v. Quinn, the amount of child support was not based upon the actual overnights granted, and thus reversal was required for a re-calculation. Quinn v Quinn
Boyd v. Boyd
In Boyd v. Boyd, the trial court erred in not calculating an amount of arrearages. Where a party concedes that not all court-ordered child support was paid, the trial court errs in failing to resolve the amount of arrearages. It was a stipulated fact that there was an accumulated arrearage but the amount was not […]
Smith v. Smith
In Smith v. Smith, the applicable date for determining whether assets and liabilities are classified as marital or nonmarital was the date of the filing of the petition for dissolution of marriage. Assets and liabilities not in existence on that date should not be classified as marital. Thus, the equitable distribution scheme that the trial […]
Drouin v. Stuber
In Drouin v. Stuber (a paternity case), the mother sought to vacate a 2011 judgment that had declared another man to be biological father despite the fact that the child had been born during an intact marriage. The appellate court reversed the order setting aside the earlier order, because it was the legal father’s rights […]
Richeson v. Richeson
According to Richeson v. Richeson, a court has no authority to partition jointly-held property in the absence of the parties’ agreement or a specific pleading requesting partition. Richeson v Richeson
Stantcheva v. Stantcheva
Stantchev v. Stantcheva is an equitable distribution case based upon the date of valuation. Two months before the date of filing the Husband had made a transfer from a marital account in the U.S. to a marital account in Bulgaria, and during the transfer and exchange of the funds from U.S. Dollars to Bulgarian leva […]
Suleiman v. Yunis
In Suleiman v. Yunis, the Former Husband had obtained an ex parte order changing the children’s custody to him. The Former Wife moved to vacate, which was denied by the trial court. This was error. Former Wife correctly argued that Former Husband did not allege that the children were being threatened with physical harm or […]