An interspousal gift is established by showing “ ‘(1) donative intent, (2) delivery or possession of the gift, and (3) surrender of dominion and control of the gift.’ “ Vigo v. Vigo, 15 So.3d 619, 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (quoting Mills v. Mills, 845 So.2d 230, 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)). The burden is […]
Tag: Men’s Rights Law Firm
Weaver v. Weaver
Weaver v. Weaver is an equitable distribution case. The trial court’s distribution was unequal, and granted the Wife partial interest in a non-marital asset of the Husband due to enhancement during the marriage because of the contribution of marital funds. This was error because there was no substantial, competent evidence supporting the enhancement of the […]
Felipe v. Rincon
Felipe v. Rincon is a good reminder that certificates of service provide prima facie proof of actual service, and that actual service of pleadings is an indispensable component of due process. Here, a Default Final Judgment is set aside because the pleadings underlying it were not served, so there was no notice, even though the […]
Blevins v. Blevins
In Blevins v. Blevins, the trial court abused its discretion by granting modification based upon circumstances that were known at the time of the Final Judgment. The alleged change in circumstances was related to the distance of the Mother’s home from the child’s school, which was known at the time of the divorce. Blevins v […]
Hall v. Hall
In Hall v. Hall, the trial court denied the Husband’s motion to declare that the parties’ MSA was incomplete. The evidence presented did not support his claim of incompleteness. It appears that he was merely complaining that he made a bad deal. The fact that one party to an agreement apparently made a bad bargain […]
How To Employ Your Family Law Attorney Effectively In a Divorce Case
Going through a divorce is likely to be one of the most stressful times in your life. No matter how long you have been married, a divorce results in an upheaval of almost every aspect of your life. Because your attorney is your advocate and has been hired to fight to protect your rights during […]
Garcia v. Garcia
Garcia v. Garcia was a case involving a request by the former husband for a downward modification of child support. The case was tried by the general magistrate, who denied the petition, and the trial judge adopted the recommendations after the former husband filed exceptions. This was error, because the record provided to the judge […]
Kemp v. Kemp
In Kemp v. Kemp, the trial court ordered an interim partial equitable distribution in the absence of a motion requesting such a distribution, and in the absence of any indication that such distribution could be revisited at a later date. This was error. The only thing requested was temporary attorney’s fees, which was denied. The […]
Floyd v. Gray
In Floyd vs. Gray, the appellate court was called upon to consider whether or not a relationship between two teenagers was the equivalent of “dating” as defined under the dating violence injunction statute. The court concluded that it was, even though the middle school “couple” only considered themselves to be boyfriend and girlfriend but did […]
My child says that he/she wants to live with me. Can’t the court just let my child decide where he/she wants to live?
The court will not simply take your child’s preference on where he/she wants to live as the only controlling factor to consider. Children are generally not capable of knowing what is in their own best interest. It is up to parents, or the Court, to make the necessary decisions for the minor children, until they […]